[jsr294-modularity-eg] dependency declaration syntax...

[Alex Buckley]

Yes. The EG knows that versions are often ranges. You can assume that a 
parser for any syntactic term representing a version will be capable of 
reading [](.,+- at least. This is why I used VER, not ID (identifier), 
in my grammar, since identifiers don't have commas and dots.

Alex

Mark Derricutt wrote:
> Do any of these schemes provide for version range declarations?  Ala 
> foo@[1.3,2.0) ?
> 
> -- 
> Discouragement is a dissatisfaction with the past, a distaste for the 
> present, and a distrust of the future - Maree De Jong, Life NZ.
> http://www.talios.com
> 
> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Bryan Atsatt <bryan.atsatt at oracle.com 
> <mailto:bryan.atsatt at oracle.com>> wrote:
> 
>     2. Granularity + opaque string:
> 
>       requires module foo at 1.3;
> 
>     3. Granularity + unbounded key/value strings:
> 
>       requires package name=bar, version=1.1, vendor=acme;
> 
>