[jsr294-modularity-eg] Language and VM spec changes for modules
Richard S. Hall
heavy at sun.com
Fri Feb 6 16:38:51 EST 2009
While interesting, it seems these documents are jumping the gun, since
it seems we are still coming to agreement on the meaning/form of module
visibility and module membership. These documents push module "requires"
and "permits" (i.e., dependencies) into the source code without settling
the initial discussion.
I am still interested in concluding Peter's discussion on unbound vs.
bound modules, since I think the distinction between these two concepts
could definitely help.
Alex Buckley wrote:
> Please find attached:
> - the proposed grammar and semantics of modules in the Java language
> - classfile changes to encode module membership
> - the VM changes to implement module-private accessibility
More information about the jsr294-modularity-eg