[jsr294-modularity-eg] iJam

Michal Cierniak cierniak at google.com
Tue Sep 18 14:31:56 EDT 2007


Doug and Rok,

This looks very interesting!

A quick clarifying question: it's not clear to me from either the
paper or the web site or the paper what is the JAM referred to in the
paper.  Is this the JSR-294 proposal?  Or perhaps something else?

Michal

On 9/18/07, Doug Lea <dl at cs.oswego.edu> wrote:
> I should have CC'ed this to 294 list...
>
> > From: Doug Lea <dl at cs.oswego.edu>
> > To: Rok Strnisa <Rok.Strnisa at cl.cam.ac.uk>
> > Subject: Re: iJAM: a proposal for improvement of JAM
> >
> >
> > Rok Strnisa wrote:
> >> Dear Alex, Andreas, Doug, and Stanley,
> >>
> >> I wonder whether you saw an email we sent to the modules' mailing lists
> >> a couple of weeks ago. Basically, we have written, formalized and
> >> prototyped a proposal for improvement of the Java Module System (JAM).
> >> The main document describing our work can be found here:
> >>
> >>   http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rs456/iJAM/iJAM_doc.pdf
> >>
> >> The other documents, including the implementation and the formalization,
> >> can be found on the project's website:
> >>
> >>   http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rs456/iJAM/
> >>
> >> Comments and suggestions very welcome.
> >>
> >
> >
> > Sorry for delay. (I've been triaging out almost everything
> > other than upcoming multicore stuff as I've been falling so
> > far behind on even that.)
> >
> > I just took a look and feel even worse about ignoring it first
> > time around because it is VERY nice! It took a couple of reads
> > to see that the non-reverse dfs was not only what you want, but the
> > key to cleanly supporting "import own M" and "import M as X".
> > (You might restructure this little paper a bit to give away
> > the punch line up front?)
> >
> > The only concern I have that I can't offhand dismiss is
> > whether there might be some weird
> > incompatibility with non-module-based class-loading (module and
> > non-module-based will need to co-exist). have you thought this
> > through?
> >
> > What do others think?
> >
> > -Doug
> >
> _______________________________________________
> jsr294-modularity-eg mailing list
> jsr294-modularity-eg at cs.oswego.edu
> http://cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/jsr294-modularity-eg
>


More information about the jsr294-modularity-eg mailing list