[jsr294-modularity-eg] Superpackage defining class loader

[Michal Cierniak]

I was wondering the same thing.  Why do we have this requirement in
the strawman?

Michal

On 4/20/07, Glyn Normington <glyn_normington at uk.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> The strawman currently says that a superpackage must be defined by the same
> class loader as its member classes.
>
> In discussion with Alex, it seems this may be stated too strongly and maybe
> it should have been phrased in terms of initiating class loaders.
>
> I'd appreciate a summary of the thinking which led to the statement in the
> strawman.
>
>  Glyn
> _______________________________________________
> jsr294-modularity-eg mailing list
> jsr294-modularity-eg at cs.oswego.edu
> http://cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/jsr294-modularity-eg
>
>