[jsr294-modularity-eg] hide otherwise exported classes

[Glyn Normington]

Hi Andreas

> I think we should not get too deep into a syntax discussion until we 
have nailed 
> down the more fundamental issues.

I couldn't agree more! :-)

I was simply logging my comments against Eugene's thread while it was 
active.

Note I wasn't actually thinking about syntax. I'm more concerned with what 
the "export signature" of a superpackage might logically look like and how 
it is constructed, stored, and used.

Glyn

Andreas Sterbenz <Andreas.Sterbenz at sun.com> wrote on 16/04/2007 09:11:45:

> Glyn Normington wrote:
> > 
> > Also, 'hide' seemed to be a valuable feature of the MJ paper and 
> > prototype that IBM Research did ([1] - worth reading for background as 

> > it covers very similar ground to JSR 294).
> 
> Your point about a practical and concise syntax is well taken, but I 
think 
> we should not get too deep into a syntax discussion until we have nailed 

> down the more fundamental issues.
> 
> Andreas.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jsr294-modularity-eg mailing list
> jsr294-modularity-eg at cs.oswego.edu
> http://cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/jsr294-modularity-eg






Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20070416/eb554968/attachment.html