[Isolate-interest] deafening silence about refactored APIs

[Pete Soper]

I realize the strawman7 "javadoc" requires a lot of familiarity with the 
last public review doc and some info from the EG to fully appreciate, but I 
didn't expect a full month without any comments. Maybe all the spam caused 
folks to route their mail from this list to /dev/null? (Doug is usually beating
me to the punch to toss the SPAM but I'm confident there won't be more than
a weekend's worth of lag before any message to the list gets distributed
assuming our vacation/travel doesn't overlap).

If some of you are PO'd by my lack of responses to your email, please give me 
another chance. I've tried to respond in every case but I get loads of SPAM 
and have a bad memory for needed replies.

Regards,
Pete

Pete Soper <psoper@pjs.East.Sun.COM> said:
> Here is the javadoc for a previously mentioned proposal for refactoring the
> JSR-121 APIs in reaction to not getting onto the Tiger train.
> 
> This won't make any sense at all without reference to the last formal
> public review draft and some bits require explanation that I and perhaps
> the rest of the EG simply will not be able to supply quickly: apologies in
> advance, it isn't about lack of desire, for sure.
> 
> My further apologies for not being able to do anything but a "cp -r" from the 
> EG's files as publication. But so many of you have sent patient pleas to "get
> on with it!" that I thought this might help for the moment:
> 
>   http://bitser.net/isolate-interest/strawman7/
> 
> Regards,
> Pete
> _______________________________________________
> Isolate-interest mailing list
> Isolate-interest@altair.cs.oswego.edu
> http://altair.cs.oswego.edu/mailman/listinfo/isolate-interest
> 
--
Pete